<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blankenblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com</link>
	<description>Windows Phone and my musings on the world around us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Technical Recruiters Get It Wrong &#8211; Part 1 by Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/05/19/how-technical-recruiters-get-it-wrong-part-1/#comment-4329</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/05/19/how-technical-recruiters-get-it-wrong-part-1/#comment-4329</guid>
		<description>I had a look at the date on some of the comments above, and, just for a second, I thought &quot;you know, this post could have been written this week, not in 1999, because it&#039;s still relevant in terms of how badly some recruiters behave today!&quot;. Then I realised that, from the fact you mentioned Silverlight in your post, there must just have been something up with the date stamp in some of the earlier comments to your post! 

Anyway, if anything, I&#039;d say that the activities of some recruitment agencies *has* got considerably worse over the past decade. There are a lot more cowboys out there now who rely on nothing more than a keyword search and a copy of Outlook to facilitate the &#039;service&#039; that they provide. As long as one in ten thousand of the e-mail recipients they send unsolicited job descriptions to is vaguely relevant, and so long as one in a hundred of them is up to the job, and so long as one in ten of those is what the end user is actually looking for in terms of skills and budgetary fit, BCC is their friend and cowboy recruiters are happy to spam away. It&#039;s getting even worse now, with some of the worst offenders switching to SMS spam, knowing full-well that most developers are now smart enough to set their spam filter to block blanket e-mail messages to which they are a BCC recipient.

The sad thing is, it&#039;s us - you and me, developers and hiring managers - that are most responsible for having allowed this state of affairs to develop. Companies are so bad at technical recruitment it&#039;s laughable. The job adverts they put out (whenever they can be bothered to actually advertise themselves) frequently reveal that most managers mistakenly believe themselves to be solely in the business of selection, and not also in the business of attracting the right candidates by having something worthwhile to offer in return for what they seek. I regularly attract interest from prospective clients/employers who&#039;ve heard I&#039;m a good software developer, who want to &quot;meet for coffee&quot; in a public place that affords no privacy to the process. When I try to pre-qualify such approaches, to decide on whether I can help or not, I regularly find that, despite having seen my CV, the prospective client/employer can&#039;t even provide a job spec for the role they claim they want to interview me for. Do you think they&#039;d be interested in me if I didn&#039;t have a CV?, or if my suggestion for a meeting venue to discuss our prospective mutually-beneficial business arrangement was during my hairdressers appointment or during a noisy film at a cinema? (both of which activities I find personally relaxing, but am intelligent enough to realise are activities it&#039;s best to keep separate from serious work!). I don&#039;t think that they would be very interested either, so why they think that I&#039;ll be prepared to bellow my private career history and salary expectations, and strain to hear their confidential business needs as they shout above the hubbub in a noisy Starbucks I&#039;ll never know. 

On the developer/potential hire side of the recruitment table, there&#039;s also plenty of blame to go around. As technical professionals, most of us really don&#039;t know how to market ourselves effectively. Most developers don&#039;t maintain a technical blog (which I personally find a rather more effective communication channel to prospective clients/employers than LinkedIn, which is basically the world&#039;s biggest chain letter and of interest only to recruiters and salespeople). I can&#039;t imagine why people maintain a LinkedIn profile merely to facilitate contacts with *people that they already know*. Personally speaking, that&#039;s what my mobile phone is for. Maintaining a LinkedIn profile has only one direct effect, so far as I&#039;ve been able to tell: it increases the amount of spam you get from recruiters exponentially. Also, you will find that every single salesperson for every organisation you ever provide technical expertise to suddenly wants to be your LinkedIn BFF: it&#039;s not you they&#039;re interested in, of course, but your contacts, which is both insulting to your intelligence and yet another activity that we do that encourages and facilitates spam.


So, bottom line, the only &#039;cure&#039; to cowboy recruiters is to become better hiring managers and candidates ourselves. If you&#039;re in the latter category, get out there and make sure you have a demonstration of your abilities available online; you&#039;ll find that the work then comes to you instead of you having to actively seek it out. As hiring managers, stop letting intermediaries such as HR departments, non-technical staff and cowboy agencies ruin your chance of securing the services of the most marketable and effective developers. Treat the process in just the same way as if you were looking for a job yourself: market the opportunity, describe its benefits, and provide something that the best people can be attracted to. If instead you just sit back and expect technical talent to line up for you as if you were some managerial version of Simon Cowell, don&#039;t be surprised when the best people just aren&#039;t that into you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a look at the date on some of the comments above, and, just for a second, I thought &#8220;you know, this post could have been written this week, not in 1999, because it&#8217;s still relevant in terms of how badly some recruiters behave today!&#8221;. Then I realised that, from the fact you mentioned Silverlight in your post, there must just have been something up with the date stamp in some of the earlier comments to your post! </p>
<p>Anyway, if anything, I&#8217;d say that the activities of some recruitment agencies *has* got considerably worse over the past decade. There are a lot more cowboys out there now who rely on nothing more than a keyword search and a copy of Outlook to facilitate the &#8216;service&#8217; that they provide. As long as one in ten thousand of the e-mail recipients they send unsolicited job descriptions to is vaguely relevant, and so long as one in a hundred of them is up to the job, and so long as one in ten of those is what the end user is actually looking for in terms of skills and budgetary fit, BCC is their friend and cowboy recruiters are happy to spam away. It&#8217;s getting even worse now, with some of the worst offenders switching to SMS spam, knowing full-well that most developers are now smart enough to set their spam filter to block blanket e-mail messages to which they are a BCC recipient.</p>
<p>The sad thing is, it&#8217;s us &#8211; you and me, developers and hiring managers &#8211; that are most responsible for having allowed this state of affairs to develop. Companies are so bad at technical recruitment it&#8217;s laughable. The job adverts they put out (whenever they can be bothered to actually advertise themselves) frequently reveal that most managers mistakenly believe themselves to be solely in the business of selection, and not also in the business of attracting the right candidates by having something worthwhile to offer in return for what they seek. I regularly attract interest from prospective clients/employers who&#8217;ve heard I&#8217;m a good software developer, who want to &#8220;meet for coffee&#8221; in a public place that affords no privacy to the process. When I try to pre-qualify such approaches, to decide on whether I can help or not, I regularly find that, despite having seen my CV, the prospective client/employer can&#8217;t even provide a job spec for the role they claim they want to interview me for. Do you think they&#8217;d be interested in me if I didn&#8217;t have a CV?, or if my suggestion for a meeting venue to discuss our prospective mutually-beneficial business arrangement was during my hairdressers appointment or during a noisy film at a cinema? (both of which activities I find personally relaxing, but am intelligent enough to realise are activities it&#8217;s best to keep separate from serious work!). I don&#8217;t think that they would be very interested either, so why they think that I&#8217;ll be prepared to bellow my private career history and salary expectations, and strain to hear their confidential business needs as they shout above the hubbub in a noisy Starbucks I&#8217;ll never know. </p>
<p>On the developer/potential hire side of the recruitment table, there&#8217;s also plenty of blame to go around. As technical professionals, most of us really don&#8217;t know how to market ourselves effectively. Most developers don&#8217;t maintain a technical blog (which I personally find a rather more effective communication channel to prospective clients/employers than LinkedIn, which is basically the world&#8217;s biggest chain letter and of interest only to recruiters and salespeople). I can&#8217;t imagine why people maintain a LinkedIn profile merely to facilitate contacts with *people that they already know*. Personally speaking, that&#8217;s what my mobile phone is for. Maintaining a LinkedIn profile has only one direct effect, so far as I&#8217;ve been able to tell: it increases the amount of spam you get from recruiters exponentially. Also, you will find that every single salesperson for every organisation you ever provide technical expertise to suddenly wants to be your LinkedIn BFF: it&#8217;s not you they&#8217;re interested in, of course, but your contacts, which is both insulting to your intelligence and yet another activity that we do that encourages and facilitates spam.</p>
<p>So, bottom line, the only &#8216;cure&#8217; to cowboy recruiters is to become better hiring managers and candidates ourselves. If you&#8217;re in the latter category, get out there and make sure you have a demonstration of your abilities available online; you&#8217;ll find that the work then comes to you instead of you having to actively seek it out. As hiring managers, stop letting intermediaries such as HR departments, non-technical staff and cowboy agencies ruin your chance of securing the services of the most marketable and effective developers. Treat the process in just the same way as if you were looking for a job yourself: market the opportunity, describe its benefits, and provide something that the best people can be attracted to. If instead you just sit back and expect technical talent to line up for you as if you were some managerial version of Simon Cowell, don&#8217;t be surprised when the best people just aren&#8217;t that into you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 31 Days of Mango &#124; Day #10: Network Information by Ram Patil</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/10/31-days-of-mango-day-10-network-information/#comment-4328</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram Patil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/10/31-days-of-mango-day-10-network-information/#comment-4328</guid>
		<description>I use a button under Wi-Fi status to enable/disable it. On button click I start the ConnectionSettingsTask to change the status. And if I come back to app screen I don&#039;t see status updated. Moreover I did not see NetworkAvailabilityChanged event firing. What could be the reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a button under Wi-Fi status to enable/disable it. On button click I start the ConnectionSettingsTask to change the status. And if I come back to app screen I don&#8217;t see status updated. Moreover I did not see NetworkAvailabilityChanged event firing. What could be the reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 31 Days of Windows Phone &#124; Day #24: Embedding Fonts by Zin Min</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2010/10/24/31-days-of-windows-phone-day-24-embedding-fonts/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Zin Min</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/31-Days-of-Windows-Phone-7c-Day-24-Embedding-Fonts.aspx#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>How can we change default font of web browser control in WP7? This embedded font may not work with web browser control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we change default font of web browser control in WP7? This embedded font may not work with web browser control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 31 Days of Mango &#124; Day #25: Background Agents by Background Agents Overview for Windows Phone - Scenes From A Developer Memory - Site Root - StudentGuru</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/25/31-days-of-mango-day-25-background-agents/#comment-4318</link>
		<dc:creator>Background Agents Overview for Windows Phone - Scenes From A Developer Memory - Site Root - StudentGuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/25/31-days-of-mango-day-25-background-agents/#comment-4318</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/25/31-days-of-mango-day-25-background-agents/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/25/31-days-of-mango-day-25-background-agents/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/25/31-days-of-mango-day-25-background-agents/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 31 Days of Mango &#124; Day #14: Using OData by Rainer Borchmann</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/14/31-days-of-mango-day-14-using-odata/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainer Borchmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2011/11/14/31-days-of-mango-day-14-using-odata/#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>After a while clicking from Team to Team in der App comes an errormessage:

&quot; We have an error: The context is already trackinga different entity with the same ressource Uri.&quot;

Ihave only one Projekt on the machin. exact this Day 14... what can i do?

Please anser her or to rainer@borchmann.de

Thanks
 
Rainer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a while clicking from Team to Team in der App comes an errormessage:</p>
<p>&#8221; We have an error: The context is already trackinga different entity with the same ressource Uri.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ihave only one Projekt on the machin. exact this Day 14&#8230; what can i do?</p>
<p>Please anser her or to <a href="mailto:rainer@borchmann.de">rainer@borchmann.de</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Rainer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Ionics&#8230;Fake or Fab? by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2007/05/10/general-ionics-fake-or-fab/#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/General-IonicsFake-or-Fab.aspx#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>I inherited a General Ionics water conditioner when I bought my house in 2006, and today I had my first serious problem with it. Serious in that it was dumping water on the basement floor, but not serious in the cost of the repair! The local Ionics service technician walked me through the repair. I was able to fix it using a small hammer, a screwdriver and WD40. Now, it&#039;s running fine and purring. The distributor had a record of installing the unit in the house in 1985.

The water quality is terrific. I love this water conditioner. If this is the extent of problems after 27 years, I think they&#039;ll have a customer when I need to replace this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I inherited a General Ionics water conditioner when I bought my house in 2006, and today I had my first serious problem with it. Serious in that it was dumping water on the basement floor, but not serious in the cost of the repair! The local Ionics service technician walked me through the repair. I was able to fix it using a small hammer, a screwdriver and WD40. Now, it&#8217;s running fine and purring. The distributor had a record of installing the unit in the house in 1985.</p>
<p>The water quality is terrific. I love this water conditioner. If this is the extent of problems after 27 years, I think they&#8217;ll have a customer when I need to replace this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Phone Business Cards by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2012/02/10/windows-phone-business-cards/#comment-4313</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2012/02/10/windows-phone-business-cards/#comment-4313</guid>
		<description>Nice use of a great design! They look great and thanks for sharing


~Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice use of a great design! They look great and thanks for sharing</p>
<p>~Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 31 Days of Windows Phone &#124; Day #6: Application Bar by ux.artu.tv &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 31 Weeks of Windows Phone Metro Design &#124; 14 Using the Windows Phone App Bar</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2010/10/06/31-days-of-windows-phone-day-6-application-bar/#comment-4312</link>
		<dc:creator>ux.artu.tv &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 31 Weeks of Windows Phone Metro Design &#124; 14 Using the Windows Phone App Bar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/31-Days-of-Windows-Phone-7c-Day-6-Application-Bar.aspx#comment-4312</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Blankenburg on App Bar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Blankenburg on App Bar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 Steps To Shameless (Successful) Self Promotion by Oliver Asmus</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2008/10/28/7-steps-to-shameless-successful-self-promotion/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Asmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/7-Steps-To-Shameless-(Successful)-Self-Promotion.aspx#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>Fantastic article!  Funny I run across this now - I&#039;ve been starting my own marketing campaign within the last 2 weeks.  Nice to know that I&#039;m on the right track.  Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic article!  Funny I run across this now &#8211; I&#8217;ve been starting my own marketing campaign within the last 2 weeks.  Nice to know that I&#8217;m on the right track.  Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 31 Days of Windows Phone 7 by Learning to Develop Windows Phone Apps with a University Phone Camp &#124; MSDN Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffblankenburg.com/2010/09/30/31-days-of-windows-phone-7/#comment-4310</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning to Develop Windows Phone Apps with a University Phone Camp &#124; MSDN Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/31-Days-of-Windows-Phone-7.aspx#comment-4310</guid>
		<description>[...] the User Experience Design Guidelines, downloaded and investigated the Sample Projects, and found 31 Days of Windows Phone particularly helpful. Thanks to a selection of Windows Phones at our university, I had the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the User Experience Design Guidelines, downloaded and investigated the Sample Projects, and found 31 Days of Windows Phone particularly helpful. Thanks to a selection of Windows Phones at our university, I had the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

